Our Basic Concept
NEOJAPAN’s managerial philosophy is to “contribute to the formation of an abundant society through real IT communications.” Our goal is to provide not only a few advanced companies with the advantages of top-end IT, but all companies.
Based on this managerial philosophy, we see building corporate governance as essential to improving corporate value so as to fulfill the expectations and trust of our stakeholders—including NEOJAPAN’s shareholders, business partners and employees—and we endeavor to construct the optimal administrative structure to ensure sound, efficient and transparent operations.
Corporate Governance System
NEOJAPAN has adopted a board of auditors system. In accordance with the Companies Act of Japan, the company convenes general meetings of shareholders and has set up a Board of Directors and Board of Auditors.
The seven members of the Board of Directors (of whom three are outside director) engage in prompt decision-making and NEOJAPAN ensures that the Board plays an active role. Furthermore, NEOJAPAN has configured its Board of Auditors so that all three of its members are from outside the company. This arrangement maintains fair and transparent management based on objective, neutral auditing of the company’s business affairs. We believe these two bodies create corporate governance with an efficient managerial system and fully functioning business auditing.
Board of Directors
|Number of members||7 (including 3 outside directors)
The Articles of Incorporation stipulate a maximum of 8 directors of the Company
|Duties||Determine on important management matters, such as management policies, and legal matters; oversee the execution of business.|
|Meeting schedule||Monthly, in principle
Meetings held as needed to accelerate management decisions
Audit & Supervisory Board
|Number of members||3 (all outside auditors)
One member is a full-time auditor
|Duties||Confirm and discuss the status of audits, collaborate with the Internal Audit Office and accounting auditors, and periodically request reports on audits.
Attend meetings of the Board of Directors, conduct business audits and accounting audits including interviewing directors and reviewing materials.
Full-time Audit & Supervisory Board Members attend meetings of the Board of Directors and other important meetings, and fully audit the business execution of directors.
|Meeting schedule||Held once a month, in principle|
At our company, the Administration Department is in charge of the presentation of timely disclosure and the person responsible is the executive director of the Administration Department.
The Company endeavors to provide fair, timely, and appropriate corporate information disclosure in compliance with the “Financial Instruments and Exchange Law,” the “Tokyo Stock Exchange Regulations,” the “Rules for Timely Disclosure of Company Information of Issuers of Listed Securities,” and all relevant laws and regulations. The person in charge examines the information, follows set procedures, and in a timely manner announces information that should be disclosed.
Internal Control System
The Board of Directors has established the “Basic Policy for Internal Control System Construction” and has formulated a framework for ensuring the effectiveness and appropriateness of business operations. The internal control system has a structure for ensuring directors and employee activities comply with the Articles of Incorporation, laws and regulations, and rules associated with the management of risk of loss.
We continually seek to improve and strengthen the internal control system by reviewing regulations regarding policy content and conducting regular internal audits to verify the functional effectiveness of the internal controls.
Internal Audits and Auditor Audits
The Company has established an Internal Auditing Office, which reports directly to the representative director. One full-time internal auditor and three auditors with concurrent positions in business departments conduct internal audits. The internal auditors audit the appropriateness and effectiveness of the business execution of the business departments in accordance with internal audit guidelines and the plan for the fiscal year, and of the overall Company’s business operations in accordance with internal rules, management policies, and laws and regulations. The auditors report the audit results to the representative director and auditor and advise departments of proposals to improve operations.
Regarding audits by Audit & Supervisory Board Members, in addition to conducting audits based on the content set in the Audit & Supervisory Board Audit Plan, auditors attend meetings of the Board of Directors and others, advise on ways to strengthen the management oversight function, review documents related to important company decisions, and audit the appropriateness of the execution of duties and decision-making by the Board of Directors.
Corporate auditors have a system to regularly hold discussions and exchange opinions with the internal audit supervisors and accounting auditors.
The Company has an audit contract with Azusa Audit Corporation, a limited liability company. No special interest exists between the Company and the auditing corporation or the Company and the executive officers of the auditing corporation that audit the Company. The certified public accountants that conducted the audits of the corporate accounts were Yasuyuki Morimoto and Masato Kaizuka. Five certified public accountants and three others from the Company assist in the audits.
Outside Directors and Auditors
Our company appoints three outside directors and three outside corporate auditors. Enhancing and strengthening corporate governance is a priority. The Company continuously seeks to strengthen the management oversight function and maintains a governance framework incorporating the neutral perspectives of outside directors and auditors in corporate supervision and audit activities with the aim of enhancing business soundness and transparency. Outside directors and auditor with an abundance of experience, knowledge, and specialized expertise from various industries attend meetings of the Board of Directors, participate in decision-making related to business execution, provide oversight, and conduct audits.
The Company has established criteria for determining the independence of outside officers based on Tokyo Stock Exchange guidelines concering the independence of independent officers.
Outside director Hirofumi Ozaki has abundant experience and deep insight as a tax accountant for numerous corporate clients. Shigehiko Matsumoto has abundant experience and deep insight as a manager of various corporate operations at financial institutions and companies, including in the system development field. Tsuneko Aoki was deemed suitable as an outside director of the Company based on her broad knowledge and experience from many years of advisory operations at a venture capital firm.
Outside auditor Masahiko Umezono and Toshio Iwasaki have many years of experience in financial institutions, deep insight and experience as managers, and extensive knowledge of finance and accounting. Masao Fujii was deemed suitable as an outside auditor based on his abundant experience and expertise in legal affairs as a lawyer.
No personal, capital, business, or other conflicts of interest exist between the Company and the outside directors and auditors.
The Company does not have a policy regarding the amount of remuneration for directors. The maximum amount of remuneration for directors and corporate auditors is determined by resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders. Compensation amounts for directors are determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors, and for corporate auditors by a resolution of the Board of Corporate Auditors.
|Officer classification||Total compensation
(yen in thousands)
|Total remuneration by type
(yen in thousands)
|Directors (excluding outside directors)||161,760||161,760||-||-||-||4|
|Auditors (excluding outside auditors)||-||-||-||-||-||-|
- * Total remuneration for each officer of the submitting company is not presented because no individual total remuneration exceeds ¥100 million.